From Mark Landsbaum
How do the global warming alarmists “know” things will be warmer in the future? No, they don’t use crystal balls, although that might be an improvement. They use computer models. As any computer-savvy person knows, garbage in, garbage out.
It ought to be a red flag that the computer models are so unreliable that when they tried to replicate temperatures we’ve already experienced and put in the kind of atmospheric and economic data they typically use, they got out the wrong temperatures. They couldn’t even “predict” what’s already happened. So, what did they do? They “tweaked” the models to arrive at the correct answer.
Guess what. They do the same thing when forecasting temperatures we haven’t yet experienced. Yes, you probably see the problem there. They don’t know the correct answer for the temperature in 10 years or 50 years or 100 years. Ah, but they do know the answer they want. So they tweak the models to get that one. Beginning to see a problem with this “science?”
As Sen. James Inhofe reports: ”A leading scientific skeptic of global warming fears, Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, former CEO of the Netherlands’ Royal National Meteorological Institute, took the critique of climate models that predict future doom a step further. Tennekes wrote on February 28, 2007, ‘I am of the opinion that most scientists engaged in the design, development, and tuning of climate modes are in fact software engineers. They are unlicensed, hence unqualified to sell their products to society’.”
