OCRegister.com
SUBSCRIBE | IN TODAY'S PAPER | E-REGISTER | CUSTOMER SERVICE | SIGN-IN | HELP | ADVERTISE
Search:
Orange Punch ~ Opinion blog maintained by editorial writers Alan Bock, Mark Landsbaum and Steven Greenhut

Archive for the 'Medical Marijuana' Category

Barney Frank not quite so bold as I thought

June 19th, 2009, 2:39 pm by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer

The Marijuana Policy Project, usually pretty reliable, seems to have understood poorly the piece of legislation, HR 2835, that Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank introduced on June 11, and I posted quickly at a time when Congress’ server was down and I couldn’t get to the primary source. It’s not a recreational legalization bill, but a Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act. It would move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule II under the Controlled Substances Act, which would be important and long overdue. Other than that, it provides that the CSA does not authorize penalties or prosecution for possession, use, production or transportation of marijuana “in a State in which marijuana may be prescribed or recommended by a physician for medical use under applicable State law.”

Now that would be an important reform in that it would make it clear that patients and providers in states with medical marijuana laws are not violating federal law. But it does not extend medical marijuana authorization to states that have not approved it themselves (although one could argue that by moving marijuana to Schedule II that would be the de facto result, and that may be Frank’s real intention).

It’s true, as one of the commenters noted, that Huntington Beach’s Dana Rohrabacher is a co-sponsor on this legislation (as is Ron Paul). Those are the only two Republicans. And the proposal, while welcome, is nowhere near as bold as I had thought yesterday. I’m checking to see if Barney introduced another more ambitious bill later.

Full list of co-sponsors: Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. FARR, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. PAUL, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. STARK, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. OLVER, and Ms. BALDWIN)


CNN pretty fair and balanced on marijuana

June 18th, 2009, 4:05 pm by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer

Anderson Cooper on CNN has been doing segments on the question of marijuana legalization, most of them reasonably balanced, including fairly articulate people on different sides of the issue. This one, featuring CNN’s resident medical expert, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, suggests that Dr. Gupta has actually been doing some research recently. In previous appearances I have seen him simply parrot fairly standard shibboleths, citing fear of addiction and “gateway” problems and even suggesting that Marinol, the fedgov’s synthetic THC pill (which they rushed to approval and hoped to no avail would silence all the chatter about medical marijuana) was all a patient would need. He’s much better informed and nuanced than he used to be. Hope a lot of other people are capable of learning as well so we can get this thing done.

Celebrating Lysander Spooner

June 12th, 2009, 1:35 pm by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer

Randy Barnett, one of my favorite law professors, has an interesting post at the Volokh Conspiracy of law professors noting that the new Yale Biographical Dictionaryof American Law has an entry on one of the more fascinating but neglected characters of American history, Lysander Spooner, the libertarian abolitionist who is indirectly responsible for the laws making it illegal to compete with the Post Office because in  the 1840s he did so and made the gummint’s service look pathetic.

Charlie Lynch gets a year in the federal pen

June 11th, 2009, 2:08 pm by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer

Charlie Lynch, the medical marijuana dispensary provider in Morro Bay, who abided by state and local laws but got nailed by the DEA, was sentenced to a year in federal prison today. The judge at least decided not to give him the five-year “mandatory minimum” sentence that could have been given under federal law. Will he be the last martyr? Atty Gen. Eric Holder has said the feds won’t raid dispensaries any more. It’s unclear from the news stories whether the judge ever did get the formal notification of the new federal policy that he had requested. Here’s a Reason.tv piece with some background

The judge probably thought he was being lenient, but from my observation of judges in action, most get a little callous — in part because so many of the people who come before them really are lowlifes — about just what they’re doing when they take a year from somebody’s life. Lynch’s attorney says he’ll appeal. I think it’s an outrage, but then I think the federal law itself is an outrage.

Arnold’s marijuana comments resonate

May 7th, 2009, 3:21 pm by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer

You just never know what’s going to push an issue from the fringes of respectability into the mainstream. It’s way too early to tell whether the Governator’s comments last Tuesday that it is at least “time for a debate” on marijuana legalization will be much of a catalyst, but the early returns are modestly hopeful. Most California media did a reasonably straightforward story centered on the possible revenue aspects of the move, of course. But CNN (Anderson Cooper’s show) did a throughtful and balanced piece (click here for video), and the New York Times also ran a story. MSNBC and CNBC also ran segments.

I talked to Stephen Gutwillig, California director of the Drug Policy Alliance (a reformist outfit) and he said what struck him was that much of the coverage of SF Assemblyman Tom Ammiano’s introduction of a legalization bill in January had something of a joking tone, but that most of the coverage of Schwarzenegger’s comment was quite serious. Is the idea mainstream yet? Still too early to tell, but stay tuned.

Meantime the O’Leary Report, a conservative-leaning outfit, in what seems an unrelated but perhaps serendipitous development, released results of a Zogby Poll it commissioned that shows 52% of Americans nationwide (weighted to match the presidential outcome) responded favorably to this question: Read the rest of this entry »

Ah-nold on pot: Way to go!

May 6th, 2009, 4:15 pm by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer

It feels strange to say something nice about Gov. Schwarzenegger, but he does seem to have opened the doors a little more to a real debate in California on the legalization of marijuana, one of the most obvious beneficial reforms one can imagine. Responding to a question in Davis about a Field Poll that showed 56% of Californians in favor of legalizing and taxing pot, he said he wasn’t ready to endorse the idea yet, but that it was time for a debate, especially in light of evidence that doing so could raise money for the state (and save money wasted on enforcement) to the tune of $2 billion or so. I suspect this is a conservative figure.

Anyway, kudos to Arnold for having the stones to take at least a semi-logical position on this issue. Let the debate begin — or continue. We’ve never stopped trying to feed the debate here.

Charlie Lynch to be sentenced Thursday?

April 21st, 2009, 3:04 pm by by Alan Bock, Register editorial writer

Charles Lynch, the proprietor of the Central California Compassionate Caregivers medical marijuana co-op in Morro Bay, is scheduled to be sentenced on Thursday – or maybe not. He was convicted under federal law of distributing drugs, even though he was operating fully legally under California law — and under federal judicial procedures the words “medical marijuana” or “California law” were not allowed to be uttered. But the Obama administration has announced that henceforth the DEA will not raid dispensaries in states with medical marijuana laws, putting Charlie Lynch in a Kafkaesque situation — the last martyr to the DEA’s reprehensible Bush-era attempts to nullify duly enacted state laws? Reason has a pretty good chronology of the case here and plans to cover the sentencing live.

The judge in the case had asked for a formal statement of the administration’s new position, not from the local prosecutor but from Eric Holder himself, before he passed sentence. To my knowledge he hasn’t received it yet. Does that mean he will postpone sentencing again? If he proceeds under existing law it could mean at least five years in the jug.

ADVERTISEMENT